Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalmer, D.
dc.contributor.authorSnaith, Beverly
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Martine A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-13T14:26:54Z
dc.date.available2018-04-13T14:26:54Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.citationPalmer D, Snaith B and Harris MA (2018) Assistant radiographer practitioners: creating capacity or challenging professional boundaries? Radiography. 24(3): 247-251.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/15487
dc.descriptionYesen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Over the last 2 decades the assistant radiographer practitioner (ARP) role has been introduced into NHS diagnostic imaging departments as a strategy to expand the workforce and create capacity. This skill mix initiative has not been implemented in a standardised way and there is limited knowledge of the current role scope within general radiography (X-Ray). Method An electronic survey of ARPs working within UK diagnostic imaging departments was conducted. Both open and closed questions sought information regarding basic demographic data (age category; gender; geographic region), scope of practice (patient groups; anatomical regions; imaging outside of the diagnostic imaging department), limitations placed on practice, supervision and additional roles. Results A total of 108 responses, including 13 trainees, were received. Most sites employ three or less ARPs in general radiography (n = 43/66; 65.2%), although 11 sites have five (range 1–15). The majority undertake imaging of both adults and children (n = 85/108; 78.7%), although limitations on age were described. Their scope of practice covers a broad anatomical range and included some non-ambulant patients. The level of supervision varied with some sites empowering ARPs to check the referral prior to examination (n = 25) or images post acquisition (n = 32) (both n = 20/66; χ2 = 16.003; 1df; p = 0.000). Conclusion ARPs are helping to maintain capacity in imaging departments but we suggest there is further scope for expansion. The practice described by the post holders suggests that many are working beyond the scope envisaged by the radiography professional body.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.03.001en_US
dc.rights© 2018 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.en_US
dc.subjectAssistant practitioner; Radiography; Scope of practice; Skill mix; X-rayen_US
dc.titleAssistant radiographer practitioners: Creating capacity or challenging professional boundaries?en_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.date.Accepted2018-03-01
dc.date.application2018-03-19
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionAccepted Manuscripten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-19T12:16:32Z


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
Snaith_Radiography.pdf
Size:
374.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
To keep suppressed
Thumbnail
Name:
Snaith_et_al_Radiography.pdf
Size:
485.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record