People, process and policy perspectives on food security: An exploration using systems archetypes
dc.contributor.author | Sharif, Amir M. | * |
dc.contributor.author | Irani, Zahir | * |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-07T15:22:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-07T15:22:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sharif AM and Irani Z (2016) People, process and policy perspectives on food security: An exploration using systems archetypes. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 10(3): 359-367. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10454/14111 | |
dc.description | No | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper aims to identify a wider holistic view of the inter-relationships relating to food security from a people, process and policy perspective. This is so that decision and policy makers can identify relevant alignments between disparate and conflicting priority elements in the field. Noting the complexity of inter-related challenges posed by food security, food supply chains and growing concerns over food waste, this paper also seeks to identify cross-cutting themes relative to shared energy and water security objectives also. The authors develop and adapt an existing food security framework to encapsulate the above culminating in a systems archetype that defines the intimate feed-forward relationship. As a viewpoint piece, there is no empirical work to report in this paper. An exploratory review of the literature has allowed for the extraction of food security concerns that need the attention of stakeholders across the enterprise to ensure robust food supply chains can be created, maintained and sustained through a better understanding and usage of information, knowledge and data. The authors present an adaptation of an existing food security framework to include dimensions of people, process and policy through the inclusion of a number of broad thematic areas including (amongst others): management best practices; sustainable business operations; consumption rights, behaviours and trading policies; lifecycle management; recovery and extraction; regulatory changes and policy reform; environmental and climate change impacts. The authors outline an overarching systems archetype based upon a combination of the Limits of Growth, Tragedy of the Commons and Attractiveness Principle archetypes. In doing so, providing decision and policy makers to identify and explore a range of food security scenarios and potential outcomes. This paper is a position paper that provides strategic directions on the impact of people, process and policy aspects on the development of food security policies from the perspective of local and central government decision makers. This paper provides a holistic worldview on key aspects of the global and national food security debate that seeks to assist decision and policy makers frame their decisions and policy interventions across dimensions of people, process and policy. Noting the impact of securing and maintaining the production, supply, consumption, health benefits and waste recovery aspects of food this paper provides a perspective on the inter-relationships that exist within the topical area and the socially mediated inter-relationships which exist and should be considered when engaging with the food security and food supply chain topical area. The paper raises awareness and highlights inherent inter-relationships within the food debate for the benefit of decision and policy makers present at the organisational level, specifically around people, process and policy. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | People | |
dc.subject | Food security | |
dc.subject | Food supply chains | |
dc.subject | Inter-relationships | |
dc.subject | Policy perspectives | |
dc.subject | Process perspectives | |
dc.title | People, process and policy perspectives on food security: An exploration using systems archetypes | en_US |
dc.status.refereed | Yes | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.type.version | No full-text in the repository | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2016-0008 | |
dc.openaccess.status | closedAccess | |
dc.date.accepted | 06/03/2016 |