Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPotts, David J.*
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T12:33:33Z
dc.date.available2017-09-18T12:33:33Z
dc.date.issued1978-08
dc.identifier.citationPotts D (1978) Politics, Social Cost Benefit Analysis and Planners. IDS Bulletin. 10(1): 11-14.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/13223
dc.descriptionNoen_US
dc.description.abstractThe paper explores some of the political assumptions implicit in the use of social cost-benefit analysis, and the role of economic planners using this analysis. It is argued that the recent emphasis on income distribution in project planning techniques rests on questionable assumptions about the nature and intentions of governments. These techniques can be thought of as attempts to redistribute income ‘through the back door’. Some possible justification for the use of income distribution weights in project planning is given, but it is concluded that they are very much second best to direct macro-economic policies and popular participation in planning.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1978.mp10001003.xen_US
dc.subjectProject planning; Cost benefit analysis; Distribution weights; Political assumptionsen_US
dc.titlePolitics, Social Cost Benefit Analysis and Plannersen_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionNo full-text in the repositoryen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record