View/ Open
ogbeiwi_2016.pdf (524.7Kb)
Download
Publication date
2016Author
Ogbeiwi, OsahonPeer-Reviewed
Yes
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Most academic literature uses ‘goal’, ‘aim’, ‘objective’ and ‘target’ as synonymous terms, but development and healthcare sectors define them as distinct etymological entities with varied and confusing interpretations. This review sought to constructively harmonise and differentiate each definition using a thematic framework. An inductive synthesis of definitions of the goal terms collected from 22 literature sources selected through a systematic internet search. Thirty-three specific definitions were reduced through serial category-building to single general definitions, and a set of theoretical themes generated as characteristic framework of each goal. Seven conceptual themes evolved from the synthesis, including the object, scope, hierarchy, timeframe, measurability, significance and expression of each goal term. Two terms, ‘goal’ and ‘aim’ are thematically similar as broad objects of immeasurable terminal impact, with a long-term timeframe. They signify organisational success, expressed as general purpose statements. ‘Objective’ is differentiated as a specific object of measurable intermediate outcome, with short-term timeframe. It signifies intervention effectiveness, expressed as a SMART statement. ‘Target’ is simply a specific quantifiable level of an indicator. Goal, aim, objective and target are conceptually different. New frameworks for writing complete goal statements are proposed, including impact and timeframe; and outcome, indicator and timeframe frameworks for aim and objective respectivelyVersion
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Ogbeiwi O (2016) Defining goal terms in development and health. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 22(11). 544-550.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2016.22.11.544Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2016.22.11.544