Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, S.K.*
dc.contributor.authorMountain, Gail*
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, R.J.*
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-22T10:13:27Z
dc.date.available2016-12-22T10:13:27Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationSmith SK, Mountain GA and Hawkins RJ (2016) A scoping review to identify the techniques frequently used when analysing qualitative visual data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 19(6): 693-715.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/11029
dc.descriptionNoen_US
dc.description.abstractChallenges were encountered when attempting to analyse video based data during a project exploring touch screen computer technology with people living with dementia. In order to inform the analytic process, a scoping review of published evidence was undertaken. Results of the scope illustrated the use of various techniques when analysing visual data, the most common of which was the transcription of video into text and analysed using conversation analysis. Three additional issues emerged in the course of the review. First, there is an absence of detail when describing the ethical implications involved when utilising visual methods in research. Second, limited priority is given to providing a clear rationale for utilising visual methods when audio or field notes may have been a viable alternative. Third, only 40% of reviewed articles clearly stated a chosen methodology. The conclusions of the review illustrate a lack of consistency across studies in the overall reporting of research methods and recommend that authors be explicit in their reporting of methodological issues across the research process.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe PhD is funded by the ESRC as part of the White Rose University Consortiumen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1087141en_US
dc.subjectVisual methods; Data analysis; Video recording; Qualitative researchen_US
dc.titleA scoping review to identify the techniques frequently used when analysing qualitative visual dataen_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.date.Accepted2015-08-18
dc.date.application2015-09-30
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionNo full-text in the repositoryen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record