View/ Open
Main article (502.5Kb)
Download
Publication date
2016Author
Weinert, FriedelPeer-Reviewed
yes
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The present article proposes to re-examine the parity-of-reasoning or double-standard fallacy argument, which favours a time-symmetric Gold universe model over a cosmological arrow of time. There are two reasons for this re-examination. One is empirical: 1) the recent discovery of an expanding and accelerating universe questions the symmetry assumption of the Gold universe on empirical grounds; 2) the other is theoretical: the argument from t-symmetry fails to take into account some important aspects of the topology of phase space and recently developed typicality arguments. If the parity-of-reasoning argument, which depends on the t-symmetry of probability, is reconsidered in terms of the topology of phase space and typicality arguments, the double-standard fallacy argument loses much of its appeal. The Gold universe model itself suffers from unexplained dynamic asymmetries. The upshot of this paper is that the Gold universe model is implausible or far less plausible than asymmetric models.Version
Accepted ManuscriptCitation
Weinert F (2016) The Time-Symmetric Gold Universe Reconsidered. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30(3): 231-243.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2017.1316119Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2017.1316119