Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAgyei-Ampomah, S.*
dc.contributor.authorGounopoulos, D.*
dc.contributor.authorMazouz, Khelifa*
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-08T16:15:33Z
dc.date.available2016-11-08T16:15:33Z
dc.date.issued2014-03
dc.identifier.citationAgyei-Ampomah S, Gounopoulos D and Mazouz K (2014) Does gold offer a better protection against losses in sovereign debt bonds than other metals? Journal of Banking & Finance. 40: 507-521.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/10261
dc.descriptionNo
dc.description.abstractIt is a commonly held view that gold protects investors’ wealth in the event of negative economic conditions. In this study, we test whether other metals offer similar or better investment opportunities in periods of market turmoil. Using a sample of 13 sovereign bonds, we show that other precious metals, palladium in particular, offer investors greater compensation for their bond market losses than gold. We also find that industrial metals, especially copper, tend to outperform gold and other precious metals as hedging vehicles and safe haven assets against losses in sovereign bonds. However, the outcome of the hedge and safe haven properties is not always consistent across the different bonds. Finally, our analysis suggests that copper is the best performing metal in the period immediately after negative bond price shocks.
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.014
dc.subjectGold; Precious metals; Industrial metals; Sovereign bonds; Hedge; Safe haven
dc.titleDoes gold offer a better protection against losses in sovereign debt bonds than other metals?
dc.status.refereedYes
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.versionNo full-text available in the repository


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record