BRADFORD SCHOLARS

    • Sign in
    View Item 
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Management and Law
    • Management and Law Publications
    • View Item
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Management and Law
    • Management and Law Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Bradford ScholarsCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication Date

    My Account

    Sign in

    HELP

    Bradford Scholars FAQsCopyright Fact SheetPolicies Fact SheetDeposit Terms and ConditionsDigital Preservation Policy

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Audit tendering in the UK: a review of stakeholders' views

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Eldaly_International_Journal_of_Auditing.pdf (611.8Kb)
    Download
    Publication date
    2016
    Author
    Allam, A.
    Ghattas, N.
    Kotb, A.
    Eldaly, Mohamed K.A.
    Keyword
    Audit tendering; Audit change; Independence; Audit quality; Corporate governance; Content analysis; FRC
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Despite the importance of the ongoing debate on audit tendering and its possible implications for the audit profession including audit market structure, audit quality, and auditor independence, there is an apparent lack of research into this area. Using content analysis, this study reports the results of an examination of the comment letters sent to the UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC) in response to its consultation document on the 2012 revisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code. The results indicate a general support for the FRC’s proposals with a number of key concerns related to audit quality, audit cost and auditor independence. There is also clear conflict of interests among some groups such as audit firms and companies on one side and institutional investors on the other side. There is evidence of conflict of interest between Big 4 and non-Big 4 audit firms. The findings could influence future revisions of the Code with regard to tendering and enhance policy makers’ understanding of the position taken by each group of stakeholder.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10454/10061
    Version
    Accepted Manuscript
    Citation
    Allam A, Ghattas N, Kotb A and Eldaly MK (2016) Audit tendering in the UK: a review of stakeholders’ views. International Journal of Auditing. 21(1): 11-23.
    Link to publisher’s version
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12076
    Type
    Article
    Collections
    Management and Law Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.