Assessment of cerebral venous return by a novel plethysmography method
Zamboni, P. Menegatti, E. Conforti, P. Shepherd, Simon J. Tessari, M. Beggs, Clive B.
Zamboni, P.
Menegatti, E.
Conforti, P.
Shepherd, Simon J.
Tessari, M.
Beggs, Clive B.
Publication Date
2012
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Keywords
Adult, Blood flow velocity, Case-control studies, Cerebral veins, Physiopathology, Ultrasonography, Cerebrovascular circulation, Cerebrovascular disorders/diagnosis, Chi-Square distribution, Chronic disease, Cross-sectional studies, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Italy, Logistic models, Male, Middle aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Multivariate analysis, Patient positioning, Plethysmography, Predictive value of tests, Principal component analysis, ROC curve, Regional blood flow, Sensitivity and specificity, Spinal cord, Blood supply, Supine position, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color, Transcranial, Venous insufficiency, REF 2014
Rights
Peer-Reviewed
Open Access status
closedAccess
Accepted for publication
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Additional title
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging and echo color Doppler (ECD) scan techniques do not accurately assess the cerebral venous return. This generated considerable scientific controversy linked with the diagnosis of a vascular syndrome known as chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) characterized by restricted venous outflow from the brain. The purpose of this study was to assess the cerebral venous return in relation to the change in position by means of a novel cervical plethysmography method. METHODS: This was a single-center, cross-sectional, blinded case-control study conducted at the Vascular Diseases Center, University of Ferrara, Italy. The study involved 40 healthy controls (HCs; 18 women and 22 men) with a mean age of 41.5 +/- 14.4 years, and 44 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS; 25 women and 19 men) with a mean age of 41.0 +/- 12.1 years. All participants were previously scanned using ECD sonography, and further subset in HC (CCSVI negative at ECD) and CCSVI groups. Subjects blindly underwent cervical plethysmography, tipping them from the upright (90 degrees ) to supine position (0 degrees ) in a chair. Once the blood volume stabilized, they were returned to the upright position, allowing blood to drain from the neck. We measured venous volume (VV), filling time (FT), filling gradient (FG) required to achieve 90% of VV, residual volume (RV), emptying time (ET), and emptying gradient (EG) required to achieve 90% of emptying volume (EV) where EV = VV - RV, also analyzing the considered parameters by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and principal component mathematical analysis. RESULTS: The rate at which venous blood discharged in the vertical position (EG) was significantly faster in the controls (2.73 mL/second +/- 1.63) compared with the patients with CCSVI (1.73 mL/second +/- 0.94; P = .001). In addition, respectively, in controls and in patients with CCSVI, the following parameters were highly significantly different: FT 5.81 +/- 1.99 seconds vs 4.45 +/- 2.16 seconds (P = .003); FG 0.92 +/- 0.45 mL/second vs 1.50 +/- 0.85 mL/second (P < .001); RV 0.54 +/- 1.31 mL vs 1.37 +/- 1.34 mL (P = .005); ET 1.84 +/- 0.54 seconds vs 2.66 +/- 0.95 seconds (P < .001). Mathematical analysis demonstrated a higher variability of the dynamic process of cerebral venous return in CCSVI. Finally, ROC analysis demonstrated a good sensitivity of the proposed test with a percent concordant 83.8, discordant 16.0, tied 0.2 (C = 0.839). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral venous return characteristics of the patients with CCSVI were markedly different from those of the controls. In addition, our results suggest that cervical plethysmography has great potential as an inexpensive screening device and as a postoperative monitoring tool.
Version
No full-text in the repository
Citation
Zamboni P, Menegatti E, Conforti P, Shepherd SJ, Tessari M and Beggs C (2012) Assessment of cerebral venous return by a novel plethysmography method. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 56(3): 677-85 e1.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article