Building Democracy in Palestine: Liberal Peace Theory and the Election of Hamas
Turner, Mandy
Turner, Mandy
Publication Date
2006
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Keywords
Rights
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
Accepted for publication
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
The victory of Hamas, a proscribed terrorist organisation, in the January 2006 elections for the Palestinian Authority, was greeted with dismay by the international community, which responded by cutting off aid. This article seeks to understand why Hamas was elected, as well as the international community's response, through an analysis of the liberal peace thesis. This thesis states that democracies do not go to war with one another, thus it was thought that building a democratic Palestinian state would buttress the peace process. The Palestinian people have, however, elected an organization that rejects the peace process. This has provided a wake-up call for the US to face up to the fact that promoting democratization may not always produce the results it desires. The US sees the election of Hamas as the cause of the current crisis and the main obstacle to peace. This article, however, argues that this is merely a symptom, not the cause, of the crisis. The Palestinian Authority's lack of sovereignty and its complete dependence on Israel put severe limitations on the building of a viable, democratic state. The article concludes that the US's uncompromising response to Hamas could well undermine democracy promotion in the region.
Version
not applicable paper
Citation
Turner, M. (2006). Building Democracy in Palestine: Liberal Peace Theory and the Election of Hamas. Democratization. Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 739-755.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article