Loading...
The effect of mob justice on the rule of law and democratisation in Africa: a case study of Ghana
Ikejiaku, Brian V. ; Osabutey, J.
Ikejiaku, Brian V.
Osabutey, J.
Publication Date
2022-12
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
© 2022 The Authors. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
2022
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
The emergence of globalisation has promoted human rights education, the
media and scholarly works have drawn attention to the issue of the rule of law and mob justice activities constantly recurring in developing countries. The
paper examines the effects of mob justice on the rule of law and democratisation in Africa using Ghana as a case study. The paper is of the view that mob justice has both negative and positive effects on the rule of law and democratisation in Ghana. This is because the legal and criminal justice systems in some societies are seen by citizens as illegitimate as they fail to punish suspected criminals
appropriately; thus, negatively destroying democracy and the image of the State. Positively, mob justice serves as a wake-up call for the State to take its
responsibility to protect the rights of its citizens seriously. The paper draws on
international human rights law in the light of international legal instruments,
such as the UDHR, ICCPR, and African Charter, as well as the 1992 Constitution
of Ghana and employs mainly the Tylerian procedural justice perspective, as well as Liberal democratic theory. It uses theoretical, critically analytical and
qualitative empirical evidence (based on semi-structured interviews from
purposive sampling of 15 expert opinions and relevant organisations with a keen interest in the subject matter) for the analysis.
Version
Published version
Citation
Ikejiaku B and Osabutey J (2022) The effect of mob justice on the rule of law and democratisation in Africa: a case study of Ghana. Peace Human Rights Governance. 6(2): 181-202.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article