Loading...
Letter to the Editor: Authors' response.
Griffiths, P.G. Taylor, R.H. Henderson, L.M. Barrett, Brendan T.
Griffiths, P.G.
Taylor, R.H.
Henderson, L.M.
Barrett, Brendan T.
Publication Date
2017
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
© 2017 The Authors and The College of Optometrists. Published by Wiley. This is the peer reviewed version of the article which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12339. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
We thank Professors Evans and Wilkins for their interest in
our systematic review.(1)
We have reached the same conclusion as previous systematic
reviews published in 2008(2) and 2014(3) and a review
prepared for the New Zealand Ministry for Health in 2009.(4)
Even the ‘alternative systematic review’ prepared by Professors
Evans and Allen about which we have significant misgivings
concludes that ‘larger and rigorous randomised
controlled trials of interventions for visual stress are
required’.(5)
Version
Accepted manuscript
Citation
Griffiths PG, Taylor RH, Henderson LM and Barrett BT (2017) Letter to the Editor: Authors' response. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics. 37 (1): 109–112.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Abstract
Qualification name
Notes
A response to Professors Evans and Wilkins regarding the systematic review: Griffiths PG, Taylor RH, Henderson LM and Barrett BT (2016) The effect of coloured overlays and lenses on reading: a systematic review of the literature. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics. 36: 519–544.