Lack of attentional retraining effects in cigarette smokers attempting cessation: a proof of concept double-blind randomised controlled trial
Begh, R. Mulville, Jacqui. Shiffman, S. Ferguson, S.G. Nichols, L. Mohammed, Mohammed A. Holder, R.L. Sutton, S. Aveyard, P.
Begh, R.
Mulville, Jacqui.
Shiffman, S.
Ferguson, S.G.
Nichols, L.
Mohammed, Mohammed A.
Holder, R.L.
Sutton, S.
Aveyard, P.
Publication Date
2015-04-01
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Keywords
Adult, Attention, Behavior therapy, Combined modality therapy, Craving, Cues, Double-blind method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle aged, Reaction time, Smoking cessation, Time factors, Tobacco use cessation products, Tobacco use disordery, Treatment outcome, Young adult, Attentional bias, Attentional retraining, Cigarette smoking, Smoking cessation
Rights
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
closedAccess
Accepted for publication
2015-01-28
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
Observational studies have shown that attentional bias for smoking-related cues is associated with increased craving and relapse. Laboratory experiments have shown that manipulating attentional bias may change craving. Interventions to reduce attentional bias could reduce relapse in smokers seeking to quit. We report a clinical trial of attentional retraining in treatment-seeking smokers. This was a double-blind randomised controlled trial that took place in UK smoking cessation clinics. Smokers interested in quitting were randomised to five weekly sessions of attentional retraining (N=60) or placebo training (N = 58) using a modified visual probe task from one week prior to quit day. Both groups received 21 mg nicotine patches (from quit day onwards) and behavioural support. Primary outcomes included change in attentional bias reaction times four weeks after quit day on the visual probe task and craving measured weekly using the Mood and Physical Symptoms Scale. Secondary outcomes were changes in withdrawal symptoms, time to first lapse and prolonged abstinence. No attentional bias towards smoking cues was found in the sample at baseline (mean difference = 3 ms, 95% CI = -2, 9). Post-training bias was not significantly lower in the retraining group compared with the placebo group (mean difference = -9 ms, 95% CI = -20, 2). There was no difference between groups in change in craving (p = 0.89) and prolonged abstinence at four weeks (risk ratio = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.70, 1.43). Taken with one other trial, there appears to be no effect from clinic-based attentional retraining using the visual probe task. Attentional retraining conducted out of clinic may prove more effective. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UK Clinical Trials ISRCTN 54375405.
Version
No full-text in the repository
Citation
Begh R, Munafo MR, Shiffman S et al (2015) Lack of attentional retraining effects in cigarette smokers attempting cessation: a proof of concept double-blind randomised controlled trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 149: 158-165.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article