Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Experimental study on flexural behavior of ECC-concrete composite beams reinforced with FRP bars

Ge, W-J.
Cao, D-F.
Lu, W.
Gao, P.
Yu, J.
Ji, X.
Cai, C.
Publication Date
2019-01-15
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
Accepted for publication
2018-10-08
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Abstract
This paper presents test results of fifteen reinforced engineered cementitious composite (ECC)-concrete beams. The main parameters investigated were the amount and type of reinforcement, and ECC thickness. All reinforced ECC-concrete composite beams tested were classified into four groups according to the amount and type of main longitudinal reinforcement used; three groups were reinforced with FRP, steel and hybrid FRP/steel bars, respectively, having similar tensile capacity, whereas the fourth group had a larger amount of only FRP reinforcement. In each group, four height replacement ratios of ECC to concrete were studied. The test results showed that the moment capacity and stiffness of concrete beams are improved and the crack width can be well controlled when a concrete layer in the tension zone is replaced with an ECC layer of the same thickness. However, the improvement level of ECC-concrete composite beams was controlled by the type and amount of reinforcement used. Based on the simplified constitutive relationships of materials and plane section assumption, three failure modes and their discriminate formulas are developed. Furthermore, simplified formulas for moment capacity calculations are proposed, predicting good agreement with experimental results.
Version
Accepted manuscript
Citation
Ge W-J, Ashour AF, Cao D-F et al (2019) Experimental study on flexural behavior of ECC-concrete composite beams reinforced with FRP bars. Composite Structures. 208: 454-465.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Type
Article
Qualification name
Notes