Loading...
The scope of carer effects and their inclusion in decision-making: A UK-based Delphi study
Al-Janabi, H. Efstathiou, N. McLoughlin, C. Calvert, M.
Al-Janabi, H.
Efstathiou, N.
McLoughlin, C.
Calvert, M.
Publication Date
2021-07
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
2021-06-03
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
and Health and social care may affect family carers’ health and wellbeing in addition to patients’ lives. It is recommended that such impacts (carer effects) are considered in decision-making. However, the scope of carer effects and range of decisions where carer effects should be considered is uncertain. This study aimed to identify (i) how different categories of healthcare and social care were perceived to impact on family carers and (ii) whether there was consensus about when carer effects should be formally considered in decision-making contexts.
Methods: A Delphi study was conducted with 65 UK-based participants with expertise in dementia, mental health, and stroke. Participants considered two broad forms of ‘interventions’ (patient treatment and replacement care) and two broad forms of ‘organisational change’ (staffing and changes in timing/location of care). Participants assessed the likely impacts of health and social care on family carers and whether impacts should be considered in decision-making. The survey was conducted remotely at two time points.
Results: Participants predicted widespread impacts from interventions and organisational changes on different domains of family carers’ lives, with ‘emotional health’ the most likely outcome to be affected. Patient treatment and replacement care services (‘interventions’) were associated with positive impacts across all domains. Conversely, timing/location changes and staffing changes (‘organisational changes’) were perceived to have mixed and negative impacts. There was widespread support (80-81%) for considering carer effects in research studies, funding decisions, and patient decision-making.
Conclusion: This study highlights a perception that carer effects are widespread and important to consider in economic evaluation and decision-making. It highlights the particular need to measure and value effects on carers’ emotional health and the need to use a societal perspective to avoid cost shifting to family carers when introducing interventions and making organisational changes.
Version
Published version
Citation
Al-Janabi H, Efstathiou N, McLoughlin C et al (2021) The scope of carer effects and their inclusion in decision-making: A UK-based Delphi study. BMC Health Services Research. 21: 752.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article