Loading...
Assessing smart city projects and their implications for public policy in the Global South
Anand, Prathivadi B.
Anand, Prathivadi B.
Citations
Altmetric:
Publication Date
2021
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
© 2020 Taylor & Francis. This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences on 29 Jan 2020 available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2020.1720794.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
2020-01-20
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Files
Loading...
Anand_CSS
Adobe PDF, 345.94 KB
Additional title
Abstract
This article aims to assess critically different definitions and indicators of smart cities. Drawing on exemplary case studies, the author proposes a typology of four categories of smart cities: type A are the world leaders who pioneer ideas not predicated on smart city projects; type B are aspirational cities punching above their weight; type C are surprise transformers that use the smart city concept to propel real transformation; and type D are cases where smart city projects do not directly address the main urban problems. The discussion highlights the need to prevent �smart?wash� by avoiding superficial technological solutions that chase symptoms but not causes of some of the complex urban challenges that they are intending to address. In conclusion, the author considers the public policy implications of applying these typologies to cities in general with particular reference to the Global South.
Version
Accepted manuscript
Citation
Anand PB (2021) Assessing smart city projects and their implications for public policy in the Global South. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences. 16(2): 199-212.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article