Loading...
Nudging the capabilities for a sustainable city? When the libertarian paternalist meets the Paretian liberal
Anand, Prathivadi B.
Anand, Prathivadi B.
Publication Date
14/03/2024
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
(c) 2024 Cambridge University Press. Full-text reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to explore how social choice theory and the capability approach can help in clarifying important ethical dilemmas and issues of injustice that need to be addressed for cities to become sustainable cities. Six types of important injustices are identified covering both intra and inter-generational fairness. Some important criticisms of smart cities are considered and important safeguards and policy priorities for smart cities from the social choice and capability approach framings are identified. The main message of this chapter is that sustainability of cities is an ethical issue and not one of technology or measurement and it is all about the six types of injustices and that cities need to tackle all six of these injustices in their quest to become sustainable. Nudging and smart cities can help but these must be contextualised to priorities participation and equality. Social choice theory as formulated by Amartya Sen provides important insights to understand and deal with conflicts between different demands on freedoms of different individuals.
Version
Accepted manuscript
Citation
Anand PB (2024) Nudging the capabilities for a sustainable city? When the libertarian paternalist meets the Paretian liberal. In: Comim F, Anand PB and Fennell S (Eds) Social choice, agency, inclusiveness and capabilities. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Book chapter