The individual and situational factors predicting unethical behaviour in the workplace: a direct and conceptual replication of Jones & Kavanagh (1996)
Evans, T.R. Bartlett, J.E. Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A. llen, T. Antoniou, G. Arent, S. Asmarani, D. Binns, N. Boulton, C. Bowhay, J.
Evans, T.R.
Bartlett, J.E.
Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A.
llen, T.
Antoniou, G.
Arent, S.
Asmarani, D.
Binns, N.
Boulton, C.
Bowhay, J.
Publication Date
2025
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
2025-05-05
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
Intentions to act unethically in the workplace are purported to be driven by a number of situational and individual factors. Across two seminal vignette experiments, Jones and Kavanagh reported inconsistent effect sizes for manager and peer influence and locus of control, consistent significant effects for work quality and Machiavellianism, and consistent non-significant effects for gender. Using an innovative multi-site collaboration, the current Registered Report represents a direct replication of these experiments (N = 2218), and adds a longitudinal conceptual replication capturing self-reported unethical work behaviour (N = 1747). Both replications found a consistent small effect of having a more external locus of control and male identity, and a consistent moderate effect of machiavellianism, for increasing unethical intentions and behaviour. The situational factors, whilst consistent in direction with that of the original study, varied more substantively in effect size. Our results highlight the value of multi-site collaborations and different replication types in developing conceptual, methodological, measurement and theoretical clarity to ensure future works can progress more rapidly to minimize the negative impacts of unethical workplace behaviour and improve individual’s working lives. All materials, code and data for this project can be found here: osf.io/d3arx.
Version
Published version
Citation
Evans TR, Bartlett JE, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe A, et al (2025) The individual and situational factors predicting unethical behaviour in the workplace: a direct and conceptual replication of Jones & amp; Kavanagh (1996). Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology. Accepted for publication.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article