Radiographer reporting in the UK: A longitudinal analysis
Hardy, Maryann L. Lewis, Emily F.
Hardy, Maryann L.
Lewis, Emily F.
Publication Date
2015-05
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
closedAccess
Accepted for publication
2014-10-08
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
Radiographer reporting of plain film radiographs is an established role in the UK. Despite this previous research has demonstrated widespread inconsistencies in implementation, scope and utilisation.
A cross-sectional postal survey was undertaken to provide a longitudinal insight into changes in radiographer reporting practice. The sample comprised all individual hospital sites in the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man with both a radiology and trauma service
A response rate of 63.7% (n = 325/510) was achieved. Reporting radiographers were in place at 179 sites (55.1%) but less likely to be employed at sites with a minor injury unit rather than a full emergency department (χ2 = 71.983; p < 0.001; d.f. = 1). Radiographer utilisation has increased since 2007, although local barriers to implementation and activity were identified. Geographical variation was evident in relation to reporter employment and anatomical scope. A significant association was noted between broader anatomical scope and a wider range of referral sources (χ2 = 34.441; p < 0.001; d.f. = 1). Delayed reporting of radiographs remains the standard service delivery model across the UK.
This study confirms the significant contribution that radiographers are making to reporting capacity in the UK, although there continue to be geographical variations, particularly around anatomical scope and referral groups.
Version
No full-text in the repository
Citation
Snaith B, Hardy ML and Lewis EF (2015) Radiographer reporting in the UK: A longitudinal analysis. Radiography. 21(2): 119-123.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article