Loading...
Nietzsche or Aristotle: The implications for social psychology
Sullivan, Paul W.
Sullivan, Paul W.
Publication Date
2016
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
(c) 2016 Sullivan P. Full-text reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
Accepted for publication
2016-03-07
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
In this article, I argue that there is a divide in social psychology between a mainstream paradigm for investigating the flow of power in a largely competitive social life (such as social cognition, social identity theory, and discourse analysis) and a fringe paradigm for investigating the experience of flourishing in conditions of social learning (such as ‘the community of practice metaphor’, ‘dialogical theory’, ‘phenomenological analysis’). Assumptions of power and flourishing demand different conceptions of the self and the social world (e.g. a strategic subject or motivated tactician in a social group versus a reflective learner/artist in a community of practice). The first goal of this article is to reveal the assumptions that lead to this new classification. The second goal is to draw dotted lines to the blind-spots within these paradigms that each reveals. These blind spots are: 1) internal goods could be useful to consider for the power paradigm and external goods for the flourishing paradigm; 2) communicative rationality is underplayed within the power paradigm; while instrumental rationality is underplayed for the flourishing paradigm; 3) judgements and skill are underplayed in the power paradigm; self-interested motivations are underplayed in the flourishing paradigm.
Version
final draft paper
Citation
Sullivan PW (2016) Nietzsche or Aristotle: The implications for social psychology. Theory and Psychology. 26:393-412.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article