Loading...
How far has the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda really come since Akayesu in the prosecution and investigation of sexual offences committed against women? An analysis of Ndindiliyimana et al
Trouille, Helen L.
Trouille, Helen L.
Publication Date
2013
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
© 2013 Brill. Full-text reproduced in accordance with the publisher’s selfarchiving
policy.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
22/03/2013
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
During the first trial before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), that of Jean-Paul Akayesu, it became evident that many Tutsi and moderate Hutu women had been raped, that “rape was the rule and its absence was the exception”.1 Although, initially, not a single charge of sexual violence was proffered against Akayesu, presiding judge Navanethem Pillay interrupted the proceedings, allowing ICTR prosecutors to amend the indictment and include counts of rape and sexual violence. Akayesu subsequently became the first case to recognise the concept of genocidal rape.
However, post-Akayesu, comparatively few defendants appearing before the ICTR have been convicted of sexual violence. An analysis of the recent case of Ndindiliyimana et al2 reveals that major shortcomings beset the investigation and prosecution procedures, so that crimes of sexual violence go unpunished, although research suggests that adequate legislation is in place at the ICTR to prosecute rape
and sexual violence successfully.
Version
Accepted manuscript
Citation
Trouille H (2013) How far has the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda really
come since Akayesu in the prosecution and investigation of sexual offences committed against
women? An analysis of Ndindiliyimana et al. International Criminal Law Review. 13(4): 747-788.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article