Loading...
'Working to live, not living to work': low-paid multiple employment and work-life articulation
Smith, Andrew J. McBride, J.
Smith, Andrew J.
McBride, J.
Publication Date
2021-04
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
© The Author(s) 2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
13/06/2020
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
This paper critically examines how low-paid workers, who need to work in more than one legitimate job to make ends meet, attempt to reconcile work and life. The concept of work-life articulation is utilised to investigate the experiences, strategies and practicalities of combining multiple employment with domestic and care duties. Based on detailed qualitative research, the findings reveal workers with 2, 3, 4, 5 and even 7 different jobs due to low-pay, limited working hours and employment instability. The study highlights the increasing variability of working hours, together with the dual fragmentation of working time and employment. It identifies unique dimensions of work extensification, as these workers have an amalgamation of jobs dispersed across fragmented, expansive and complex temporalities and spatialities. This research makes explicit the interconnected economic and temporal challenges of low-pay, insufficient hours and precarious employment, which creates significant challenges of juggling multiple jobs with familial responsibilities.
Version
Published Version
Citation
Smith A and McBride J (2021) 'Working to live, not living to work': low-paid multiple employment and work-life articulation. Work, Employment and Society. 35(2): 256-276.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article