Publication

To repatriate or not to repatriate: developing a guidance framework for assisting in the resolution of cultural property disputes

Metcalfe, Paul A.
Publication Date
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Croucher, Karina
Batt, Catherine M.
Keywords
Repatriation, Culture, Human remains, Artefact, Framework, Museum, Indigenous, Cultural property, Disputes
Rights
Creative Commons License
The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.
Peer-Reviewed
Open Access status
Accepted for publication
Institution
University of Bradford
Department
School of Archaeological and Forensic Sciences. Faculty of Life Sciences
Awarded
2023
Embargo end date
Collections
Theses
Show all metadata
Files
PhD Thesis
Adobe PDF, 3.34 MB
Additional title
Abstract
Repatriation is the process of returning cultural artefacts, sacred objects and human remains to countries, communities and indigenous peoples where a rightful claim has been established. Museums and other repositories may willingly repatriate items to those legitimately seeking their return and so no dispute is likely to arise. However repatriation is a process that has not been wholeheartedly embraced by a significant number of museums and other repositories who fear the wholesale dismantling of their collections. When requests for repatriation are rejected, disputes will often arise and there is currently no satisfactory method for resolving these. This research introduces the concept of a repatriation framework specifically designed to assist in the resolution of such disputes. Frequently museums declare that they will deal with repatriation claims on a case-by-case basis but give no indication as to the criteria to be used when making their decisions. The repatriation framework ensures that all arguments (Themes) put forward by those in dispute are fully explored and ‘measured’ in the decision-making process. This is achieved by allocating a points value to each of the five levels of relevancy within each Theme. This ensures that decisions concerning the most appropriate location for cultural property are made on a rational assessment of all the relevant evidence. The repatriation framework was tested by applying it to ‘real world’ repatriation disputes. Whilst it cannot offer an answer to every dispute, it will provide clear guidance as to the museum, country or community having the most convincing claim.
URI
https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/handle/10454/20587
Version
Citation
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Thesis
Qualification name
PhD
Notes