Loading...
Foxes who want to be hedgehogs: Is ethical pluralism possible in psychology's replication crisis?
Sullivan, Paul W. Ackroyd, John
Sullivan, Paul W.
Ackroyd, John
Publication Date
2023-03
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
© 2022 The Authors. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
2022-03-03
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
In this article, we draw attention to public-private dilemmas among psychologists that make sense of the debates around the replication crisis, citation practices and networking practices. We argue that the values of justice and caring map onto the public sphere and private sphere respectively and create the horns of a dilemma for academics. While bureaucratic justice is a publicly revered value of modernity in psychological research that underpins ethics, validity, reliability and equality of opportunity, ‘caring’ is a more subtle value of traditionalism that runs in parallel and is detected only by our psychological practices. In particular, we argue that it is detected by practices such as disputes between the replicated and their replicators in replication studies (understood as a dramatic counter reality) as to who is more ‘careless’ with procedure; citation (including the self-care of self-citation) as thanksgiving and incantation of powerful others in enchantment rituals, and the system of professional indebtedness that accrues in ‘kinship’ networks – where kinship is understood broadly as adoption into a research group and its network. The clashes between these values can lead to a sense of hypocrisy and irony in academic life, as incommensurate values split between private and public expression. From this position, we delve into Isaiah Berlin's work on incommensurate values to suggest that ethical pluralism, involving more public recognition of the equal but different ethical demands of these values can help overcome these everyday dilemmas in the public sphere.
Version
Published version
Citation
Sullivan P and Ackroyd J (2023) Foxes who want to be hedgehogs: Is ethical pluralism possible in psychology's replication crisis? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 53(1): 46-61.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article